BTW: Contrary to the sidecar makers who put car tires on sidecars, my experience indicates that you want the narrowest tire that will carry the load with the lousiest tread pattern on the sidecar. Too wide &/or grippy a tire. On most outfits (not counting leaners and rigs with steered sidecar wheels) there is one optimum turning radius in each direction where the sidecar tire rolls along the ground in what you might call a normal manner. When you turn with any other radius the sidecar tire actually skips sideways and can stop turning or, on really tight turns towards the sidecar can even rotate backwards slightly. You can see how a tire with too much grip will make it hard to turn under some circumstances.
I learned this the hard way.
Interstate? We don't have those here

We have 400 class highways and I do not drive on them. Between debris falling off of big trucks and car drivers who shouldn't even be allowed to walk unless accompanied by someone who knows how, let alone take the wheel of a ton of dangerous weapon at 100+ Km/h, it just isn't worth it for any perceived saving in travel time. I find that I can usually get where I am going just as fast by taking a more direct route on secondary (usually 2 lane, 80 Km/h) roads. And I can see more scenery that way too. A wise man once wrote "If riding a motorcycle is so much fun why do we always ride like we're in a hurry to get it over with?"
That said, the first trip I made on Mr.H with the sidecar, with no windshield and no top but with my (brave) wife in the sidecar, I averaged about 11 Km/L (a bit over 31 MPG)(NOTE: I calculate mileage using real 160 oz Imperial gallons, not 120 oz miniature US gallons. This would be about 23.5 MPUSG), but that was flogging it a bit to keep ahead of the incredible number of city folks who come up here and drive like idiots on the way to & from their cottages every weekend (see my comments about licensing above

). After that I tried really babying it and actually managed to get about 14 KM/L (40MPG), but I really didn't like driving it that way.
I drove it with no windshield for a couple of weeks and then added the windshield and drove it for a few more weeks until the guy had time to build the top. With just the windshield the mileage decreased slightly and it pulled a lot more.
There was snow on the ground and my winter outfit was already on the road when I drove it home with the top on. I expected such a big top pull quite a bit and maybe require some changes in setup to compensate, but it didn't seem to pull as much as it had. But that was only my impression from a 25 minute drive on slippery roads on a machine I really didn't want to get much road salt on. I didn't drive it again until spring and when I did my first impressions were borne out. It seems that the aerodynamics of the curved top surface must be fairly slippery because the mileage came back to about what it was without the windshield and, if anything, it may even pull less at speed.
Most of my driving is my 20-25 minute commute on secondary roads at speeds between 80 & 100 Km/h, but I often take the un-paved concession roads home at 60-80. I usually average about 12.5 Km/L (about 35.6 MPG or 26.7 MPUSG). This is a lot less than the 17 Km/L (48.5 MPG) that this bike averaged when running solo (GL1000 engine & transmission + GL1100 final drive = about 1.5 gears higher than stock = very good mileage), but it is better than the 32 MPG that my old GL1000/Dnepr outfit averaged (with the same engine!!!, about 60% as big a windshield and a flat tonneau cover) so I guess I can't complain too much.
BTW: Here's a pic of my winter machine (The Famous Eccles) as it looked in 2015. Its based on a CX650E but it keeps looking closer to a GL650I and the sidecar started out as a Velorex 700. I figure Mr.H weighs about 850 Lb and Honda says a GL1000 engine makes 80 HP. Eccles weighs about 650 Lb and makes 65 HP with a narrower track width so the smaller outfit actually accelerates better and can cruise at higher speeds. The mileage averages about 15.5 Km/L (44 MPG). But that will probably change this year because I am replacing the frame with a Ural frame that weighs a bit more and is a bit wider.
NOTE: Pic hosted on Photobucket replaced. The original pic was from 2007 but I replaced it with one from 2015 with the Ural sidecar frame.
